Prosecutors unlikely to offer Sam Bankman-Fried a favorable plea deal, says lawyer

Regulation

Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) may not be able to offset the two counts of wire fraud and six counts of conspiracy he faces with the credits to be received for entering a guilty plea instead of going to trial. 

Set to appear in court in the first days of January to enter a plea deal, Bankman-Fried is “unlikely to receive a favorable deal from prosecutors,” argued Mark Kasten, counsel in Buchanan Ingersoll and Rooney’s Blockchain and Crypto Assets practice group.

Speaking with Cointelegraph, Kasten explained the government often requires defendants to assist in the prosecution of others in order to receive a cooperation credit. “Here, it is unlikely that Bankman-Fried can point the finger at anyone,” said.

Bankman-Fried may also enter into an agreement similar to Caroline Ellison and Gagy Wang called “open plea”, which means “prosecutors did not agree to recommend a specific sentence”, noted Kasten, therefore leaving the defendant’s sentence up to the judge.

Related: FTX customers file class-action lawsuit to get priority reparations

Among Bankman-Fried’s accusations are conspiracy to defraud customers and lenders, securities fraud, commodities fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy to violate campaign finance laws. If convicted, it is believed that he could get 115 years in jail.

While serving as CEO of FTX during bankruptcy proceedings, John Ray told the United States House Financial Services Committee that he had never seen “such a utter failure of corporate controls at every level of an organization, from the lack of financial statements to a complete failure of any internal controls or governance whatsoever.”

Ray also noted that the “concentration of control in the hands of a very small group of grossly inexperienced and unsophisticated individuals” had been behind the exchange’ collapse.

The Southern District of New York will hear Bankman-Fried on Jan. 3 before Judge Lewis Kaplan — a judge with a reputation for being straightforward and efficient. The case was assigned to Kaplan after judge Ronnie Abrams resigned due to conflicts of interest. Abrams’ husband is a partner at Davis Polk & Wardwell, a law firm that advised FTX in 2021.

Articles You May Like

Massive Ethereum Buying Spree – Taker Buy Volume hits $1.683B In One Hour
Ethereum Sees Neutral Netflow On Binance: What Does This Signal?
Ethereum Price Repeats ‘Bullish Megaphone’ Pattern From 2017 – Why $10,000 Is Possible
Deribit Moves $783M in Ethereum To Cold Storage: A Bullish Signal for ETH?
Ethereum Consolidation Continues – Charts Signal Potential Breakout